- 1
Zinn, in explaining his theory of history, states that, "Nations are not communities and never have been. The history of any country, presented as the history of a family, conceals fierce conflicts of interest..." What do you make of this claim? How does this first section comply with and/or undermine this assertion?
One of the core tensions in Zinn's book, and in Marxist historicism in general, is the difference between communities of people and the structures of power that rule them. This is often the most difficult concept to grasp for Americans, who are frequently raised to understand their government as an extension of communities, given the promises made by...
Join Now to View Premium Content
GradeSaver provides access to 2370 study guide PDFs and quizzes, 11018 literature essays, 2792 sample college application essays, 926 lesson plans, and ad-free surfing in this premium content, “Members Only” section of the site! Membership includes a 10% discount on all editing orders.