Hell or High Water Literary Elements

Hell or High Water Literary Elements

Director

David Mackenzie

Leading Actors/Actresses

Ben Foster and Chris Pine

Supporting Actors/Actresses

Jeff Bridges and Gil Birmingham

Genre

Neo-Western Heist

Language

English

Awards

Hell or High Water was nominated for the Academy Awards for Best Picture, Best Supporting Actor for Bridges, Best Original Screenplay, and Best Film Editing.

Date of Release

August 12th, 2016

Producer

Sidney Kimmel, Peter Berg, Carla Hacken, and Julie Yorn

Setting and Context

Western Texas

Narrator and Point of View

Hell or High Water is told through a third-person point of view (it is centered primarily around Tanner and Toby Howard, however).

Tone and Mood

Violent, Tense, High-Energy, Relentless, Solemn, and Fun

Protagonist and Antagonist

Tanner and Toby Howard (protagonist) vs. the Texas Midland Banks which have taken advantage of their family for years (antagonist)

Major Conflict

The major conflict of the film involves the brothers' attempts at robbing enough money from the Texas Midlands bank branches so that they could save their family home and ensure a better future for their kids.

Climax

The climax of Hell or High Water occurs when Tanner goes up on a mountain so his brother could escape with the stolen money for their family, killing Ranger Alberto in the process.

Foreshadowing

Alberto's death is foreshadowed by a conversation Alberto and Marcus have in their motel room.

Understatement

The effect poverty has had on Toby's children is understated in the film.

Innovations in Filming or Lighting or Camera Techniques

Hell or High Water is no doubt a well-made and well-shot film, yet it was not innovative in filming or lighting or camera techniques.

Allusions

To the following films: Sicario (2015), The Thomas Crown Affair (1968), Inside Man (2006), No Country for Old Men (2007), Unforgiven (1992), The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (1966), and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969).

Paradox

At the start of the film, it is paradoxical that the brothers would want to save their farm when there is seemingly nothing of value there. However, we later learn that this is not paradoxical because there is a lot of oil on their property (which will set up their family financially for life).

Parallelism

N/A

Update this section!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this section.

Update this section

After you claim a section you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.

Cite this page