Conjectures and Refutations by Karl Popper is based on his understanding of philosophy and reflection of thoughts. Popper applies his understanding of politics, science, and history to argue how people’s insights and objectives develop through a continual process of making mistakes to gain success. In his argument, he challenges Marx’s theory of socialism, Einstein’s theory of relativity, Alder’s individual psychology, and Freud’s psychoanalysis to form the groundwork. All the theories purporting to infer knowledge systematically are conjectures. Popper argues that anything predicted scientifically must be verified. People should develop theories and conduct tests to determine whether the prediction is correct.
The author opines that a conclusion borne out of many observations is a myth and people should not depend on it. Nobody is completely certain whether a specific theory is true. Scientists and philosophers cannot support their evidence without a hypothesis. This renders them dreamers rather than realists. Failure to confirm a possibility is fallible and many theorists search for facts without confirmation of possibility. According to Popper, the bold and risky theories offered by scientists cannot correct previous mistakes.
Theorists tend to make inferences based on more than one opinion. Such inference makes the hypothesis only likely but not certain. Popper believed that every theory should go through a test to prove whether it is correct or wrong. In his analysis, Popper explained demarcation and argued that it was grounded on falsification.
