“Aristotle’s Physica, Ptolemy’s Amalgest, Newton’s Principia and Opticks, Franklin’s Electricity, Lavoisier’s Chemistry, and Lyell’s Geology- these and may other works served for time implicitly to define the legitimate problems and methods of research field for succeeding generations of practitioners.”
The books outlined above delineate the historical scientific attainments which were influential in establishing the cornerstone for forthcoming scientific encounters. The books deliver basic theories that governed the scientific novelties of the premier scientists. Thus, they are classics that have been expedient for reference purposes and in restructuring the history of science.
“Communities in this sense exist, of course, at numerous levels. The most global is the community of all natural scientists. At an only slightly lower level the main scientific professional groups are communities: physicist, chemists, astronomers, zoologist, and the like.”
The alignment of scientists is dependent on the focus of each scientist considering that science is an expansive domain. Within the discipline there exist assorted specialties which warrant the creation of professional societies that bring together scientists concentrating on a specific field. The professional establishments oversee the publication of the periodicals which relate to the definite subfields. Additionally, the members of the various groups convene speciality conferences to discourse on various scientific matters.
“Writers on electricity during the first four decades of the eighteenth century possessed far more information about electrical phenomena than their sixteenth-century predecessors. During the half-century after 1740, few new sorts of electrical phenomena were added to their lists.”
History intersects with science; historical records are influential in recording all the scientific novelties that have been objectified during specific epochs. The deficiency of truthful historical records obfuscates the historiography of science.
