Fundamentals of Physics Extended (10th Edition)

Published by Wiley
ISBN 10: 1-11823-072-8
ISBN 13: 978-1-11823-072-5

Chapter 39 - More about Matter Waves - Problems - Page 1215: 11c

Answer

No pair of adjacent levels has an energy difference equal to the energy of the $n=6$ level.

Work Step by Step

We can find an expression for energy of an electron in this potential well when $n = 6$: $E_n = (\frac{h^2}{8m~L^2})~n^2$ $E_6 = (\frac{h^2}{8m~L^2})~(6)^2$ $E_6 = 36~(\frac{h^2}{8m~L^2})$ Let $n_h$ be the state with the higher quantum number. Let $n_l$ be the state with the lower quantum number. We can use the expression for the energy difference to try to find $n_h$ and $n_l$: $E_{n_h} - E_{n_l} = E_6$ $(\frac{h^2}{8m~L^2})~n_h^2 - (\frac{h^2}{8m~L^2})~n_l^2 = 36~(\frac{h^2}{8m~L^2})$ $n_h^2 - n_l^2 = 36$ $(n_h - n_l)(n_h+n_l) = 36$ Let's suppose that: $(n_h - n_l)(n_h+n_l) = (1)(36)$ However, there are no two integers $n_h$ and $n_l$ which satisfy this equation. Let's suppose that: $(n_h - n_l)(n_h+n_l) = (2)(18)$ However, there are no two integers $n_h$ and $n_l$ which satisfy this equation. Let's suppose that: $(n_h - n_l)(n_h+n_l) = (3)(12)$ However, there are no two integers $n_h$ and $n_l$ which satisfy this equation. Let's suppose that: $(n_h - n_l)(n_h+n_l) = (4)(9)$ However, there are no two integers $n_h$ and $n_l$ which satisfy this equation. Let's suppose that: $(n_h - n_l)(n_h+n_l) = (6)(6)$ However, there are no two integers $n_h$ and $n_l$ which satisfy this equation. Therefore, no pair of adjacent levels has an energy difference equal to the energy of the $n=6$ level.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.