The Eyes and the Impossible Irony

The Eyes and the Impossible Irony

The Hypnotic Rectangle

Johannes finds himself mesmerized by a painting that he describes as containing a serene child’s face in a chaotic storm. This image fascinates him because it portrays familiar elements in an impossible and contradictory manner. He asserts, "It was about the size of a garbage can but seemed to contain another world. There was something like a human child’s face but it was like a human child’s face in a hurricane. The sky around the child was dark and slashy. But the child’s eyes were serene!” The irony is that the dog, typically considered incapable of appreciating human art, is moved by it. While the humans who created and are supposed to understand the art are shown walking by quickly. The dog's deep contemplation contrasts with the superficial engagement of the humans, which highlights a reversal of expected behaviors.

Worshipful Goats

The protagonist encounters goats that previously mocked and sneered at his friend Helene. When they see the dog, they immediately lower their eyes and kneel treating him with reverence. Johannes states, "They were very deferential. It felt so odd, but also sort of good, having these recently cruel goats suddenly so worshipful and meek." The irony lies in the sudden shift from derision to worship driven by the goats' instinctual response to a dog—traditionally an authority figure to them. This unexpected change in behavior underscores the irony of their initial cruelty being replaced by exaggerated respect. It emphasizes the absurdity of social dynamics among these animals.

The Coda Ritual

Johannes describes the ritual of the "coda" where gulls undertake one final flight out to sea upon losing their ability to fly. Consequently, they fall and meet their end in the water. Bertrand finds this act wonderful and aspires to do the same when his time comes. Johannes views this ritual as unnecessary and tragic believing that the gulls can still live fulfilling lives without flight. The irony lies in the contrast between Bertrand’s admiration for the ritual and Johannes's disdain for it. He sees the ritual as a needless adherence to a misguided sense of honor. It also highlights the irony of celebrating a practice that he perceives as fundamentally flawed.

Immune to Misfortune

Johannes states, "I saw so many near-accidents that I had begun to think the park was somehow immune to misfortune." Immediately after this thought a toddler falls into the pond, which contradicts the protagonist’s belief. He reflects on how the park seems immune to accidents despite frequent near-misses. This sense of invulnerability is contrasted by the immediate peril faced by the toddler on the bridge. The irony lies in his false belief in the park's immunity to accidents just before witnessing a real accident.

Ridiculous Sweaters

Observing other dogs in sweaters, Johannes laughs at the absurdity only to realize he is also wearing one. He states, "Oh! I thought. Oh! Oh! For a moment I had forgotten that I, too, was wearing a sweater. I laughed to myself about this." This moment of self-realization highlights the irony of his earlier judgment. Johannes wears a sweater for warmth, which is practical yet undignified in his eyes. The irony lies in his initial ridicule and being part of what he mocks, which emphasizes the theme of self-awareness and dignity.

Update this section!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this section.

Update this section

After you claim a section you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.

Cite this page