Essay Questions

What is the most appropriate definition of arguing, according to the author?

Heinrichs approaches the book 'Thank You for Arguing' from an analytic perspective. According to the author, 'arguing' can be defined from various viewpoints, but its best definition is based on philosophy and theory. Consequently, Heinrichs defines 'argument' as a statement that claims to form a consensus. Arguing is not about quarreling but finding a solution to address a particular problem. Therefore, people should disagree to agree on specific issues that influence life in all aspects.

What steps must be taken by an individual to ensure that an argument is successful?

The author expounds that an argument can only win in any discussion if seduction and planning are applied appropriately. When people are addressed, they want to be convinced, which can only be achieved through temptation. The speaker must first plan his argument before facing the audience. The second step is to apply seductive techniques to ensure that your views will convince the audience.

How does the author define the three approaches of rhetoric?

The author refers to Aristotle's studies to give him an understanding of the various methods of rhetoric. Before the author faces his audience, he must be aware of its needs and expectations. The first approach of rhetoric is applying pathos, in which the speaker studies the emotions of his audience. The second approach is an ethos in which the speaker develops his trust, character, and confidence. The last method is logos, in which the speaker incorporates logic and rationality to build his arguments.