Answer
$L = 161~nm$
Work Step by Step
Since $n_1 \gt n_2$, there is a phase shift of $\frac{1}{2}~\lambda$ due to reflection.
Since we are looking for a maximum, the path length difference must be $~~(m+\frac{1}{2})~\frac{\lambda}{n_2}~~$, where $m$ is an integer.
We can find the required thickness $L$:
$2L = \frac{(m+\frac{1}{2})~\lambda}{n_2},$ where $m$ is an integer
$L = \frac{(m+\frac{1}{2})~\lambda}{2~n_2}$
$L = \frac{(m+\frac{1}{2})~(342~nm)}{(2)~(1.59)}$
$L = (m+\frac{1}{2})~(107.55~nm)$
$L= 53.8~nm, 161~nm,...$
Since we are looking for the second least thickness, $~~L = 161~nm$
